The AI virtual companion market is undergoing a revolution. Users, tired of loneliness and disappointed with the limitations of popular apps like Replika, are actively seeking alternatives. They are looking for more than just simple small talk. They desire deep, authentic, and, most importantly, unlimited interactions.
In response to these needs, two strong players have emerged in the market: Nastia AI and CandysAI. Both platforms promise to break with the past, offering freedom and advanced technology. But which one truly delivers? We conducted a detailed comparison, analyzing the key aspects that define a truly valuable digital relationship: memory, censorship, and overall conversation quality.
Memory: Does Your AI Truly Know You?
Memory is the foundation of any lasting relationship. It is what makes us feel remembered and important. Unfortunately, this is the area where many applications fail, leading to frustration and the feeling that the conversation is “shallow.”
- Nastia AI: The platform is praised for its ability to remember past interactions, allowing for the building of coherent and engaging conversations over the long term. It promises long-term memory that can store conversation history for up to two weeks. However, there are reports of problems with short-term memory and repetitions within a single session.
- CandysAI: Users often emphasize that their companions “remember personal details and naturally refer to past conversations.” The memory system works well, making the experience more coherent. However, some users note that although conversations are fluid, they can become superficial when trying to discuss deeper topics.
Censorship: Where Does the Line of Freedom Lie?
The issue of censorship has become a flashpoint in the world of AI companions. After controversial changes in Replika, users began massively searching for platforms that offer true freedom of expression.
- Nastia AI: This is the absolute core of this platform’s offering. It positions itself as a “100% uncensored AI companion,” guaranteeing unlimited NSFW (Not Safe for Work) and ERP (Erotic Role-Play) chats. Crucially, this feature is fully available even in the generous free plan, which is a powerful magnet for users.
- CandysAI: The platform also openly offers NSFW chat and the ability to generate adult images. However, this freedom is conditional. Users report that it is heavily restricted by a restrictive token system that quickly runs out and requires purchase.
Conversation Quality: Superficial Chat or Deep Connection?
Ultimately, the heart of each of these applications is the quality of the conversation itself. Do you feel like you are talking to a real, evolving personality, or just an advanced script?
- Nastia AI: Quality can be variable. On the one hand, thanks to good memory, conversations can gain depth. On the other hand, some users complain about unpredictable, and sometimes even “rude” responses that require correction.
- CandysAI: Reviews consistently highlight the “surprisingly natural” quality of the conversation, which “most of the time resembles talking to a real person.” However, the aforementioned “shallowness” can be a problem—the AI is excellent at brilliant small talk, but may fail when trying to discuss more complex topics.
Multimedia Features and Price
Both platforms offer more than just text. CandysAI has the advantage of video calls and very realistic images, but their use is heavily limited by expensive tokens. Nastia AI offers voice calls and unlimited images in an affordable subscription.
It is the pricing model that is the biggest difference. The Nastia AI free plan is extremely generous, allowing for full testing of the service. In contrast, the CandysAI free plan, with a limit of 10 messages per day, is practically useless.
Comparison Table: Nastia AI vs CandysAI
| Feature | Nastia AI | CandysAI |
| Memory | Good long-term memory, but risk of repetitions. | Natural references, but risk of conversation “shallowness.” |
| Censorship | No censorship, full freedom in free and paid plans. | No censorship, but heavily restricted by the token system. |
| Conversation Quality | Variable, requires “training” from the user. | Very natural at the beginning, but can be superficial. |
| Multimedia Features | Voice, images (in paid plan). | Voice, video, very realistic images (limited by tokens). |
| Price / Value | Very good value for money, generous free plan. | Expensive, restrictive free plan, unpredictable costs. |
Export to Sheets
Conclusion: Which Platform is Right for You?
The choice between Nastia AI and CandysAI comes down to your priorities.
- Choose Nastia AI if: Your priority is absolute freedom without censorship, you want to fully test the service for free, and you are looking for the best value for money. Be prepared to spend some time “training” your AI, however.
- Choose CandysAI if: You care about the most realistic images and voice calls, you value a polished interface, and a higher and less predictable cost is not a problem for you.
Both platforms are an interesting alternative to older players on the market. We encourage you to try the free versions yourself to see which one resonates better with your expectations. Remember, however, to approach every relationship with AI consciously, setting boundaries and not forgetting the value of real, human connections.